Post nuptial vs. Life or accident Insurance policy? - accident insurance policy
My husband and I just had a contract for marriage. My contract is all that he had bought life insurance before and after our wedding, it was an accident, the duration of insurance or family for me is that the recipient canceled effective on that date and the future.
My question is that some say that the life insurance policy on the state can replace or substitute the post-marital depends. If this is the case of marriage as we all agree nothing is lost. And when my husband bought an insurance policy on family life / accident insurance without knowing to pick up again and again at their expense if something happens. Is that true? What is the law's most powerful policy of life insurance or legal marriage later. I'm from Michigan
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Accident Insurance Policy Post Nuptial Vs. Life Or Accident Insurance Policy?
8 comments:
He could have adopted a policy on you without your knowledge. She had to sign the form and have been processed, you as owner and beneficiary of the policy. If desired, the basket at home and get a family plan, that is the main breadwinner, spouse and children of all present and future, all on one policy. Think like the long-term insurance and build a retirement account.
The policy change what you're after-PIM.
He could have adopted a policy on you without your knowledge. She had to sign the form and have been processed, you as owner and beneficiary of the policy. If desired, the basket at home and get a family plan, that is the main breadwinner, spouse and children of all present and future, all on one policy. Think like the long-term insurance and build a retirement account.
The policy change what you're after-PIM.
For more information about insurance, visit the following website.
I found it very informative
http://www.usalegalcare.com/Insurance_Claim.htm
and if you enter help in the search for legal assistance, please tjeir easy and preserved.
Trust me its good
Life insurance is a contract, the only way is to change, if the landlord changes the contract with the insurer.
Wills, Trust and Nuptse, like all secondary to the contract between the owner of the police and the insurance company.
In other words, is what in politics forever, who is the beneficiary, that money goes into the death of the insured. If you and your husband to go his own way, and he never changed recipient of your life insurance, and hence the name of the beneficiary under the contract would make money.
Post Nuptuals are active accumilated after the wedding is dissovled, GER nuptuals assets which are the front accumilated well. There is no insurance.
The insurance company is obligated to the beneficiary and the agreement will not cease to be paid. The beneficiaries of these measures have to change or cancel altogether. However, if the contractor fails to amend or cancel, without their consent.
Who owns the policy, can only go ahead and change the consent of the beneficiary, unless it is "irrevocable."
A post-marital agreement does not affect the conditions of the beneficiaries.
I think it is the owner of the policy - that is, you get the selection of beneficiaries. If you are the owner of the policy, you can change the recipients.
Holder of the policy and "insured can be" and are often two different things.
Who owns the policy, can only go ahead and change the consent of the beneficiary, unless it is "irrevocable."
A post-marital agreement does not affect the conditions of the beneficiaries.
I think it is the owner of the policy - that is, you get the selection of beneficiaries. If you are the owner of the policy, you can change the recipients.
Holder of the policy and "insured can be" and are often two different things.
Uh ... Forgive me if I hand it's really a nonexistent problem. You can (and should) communicate with insurance companies and submit specific forms to update the receiver. Period.
I assume you play and try to apply the post-marital agreement after the fact, but it seems a bit silly because it only matter of signing papers for him now. Why should we take that risk?
Post a Comment